Apple says Jon Prosser ‘has not indicated’ when he may respond to lawsuit

Let’s be clear: the entire situation surrounding Jon Prosser and Apple is less a legal battle and more a beautifully staged performance. And Apple’s statement – “Apple says Jon Prosser ‘has not indicated’ when he may respond to lawsuit” – is the most spectacularly underwhelming reaction to a situation that’s been simmering with enough drama to fuel a season of reality TV.

It’s fascinating, isn’t it? The core claim here is that Prosser, who boldly declared he’s been “in active communications with Apple,” hasn’t yet decided *when* he’ll address the lawsuit. Let’s unpack this, because apparently, legal strategy involves meticulously scheduling the timing of responses to accusations of leaking confidential information. Honestly, I’ve seen more decisive behavior from a sloth.

Apple’s assertion feels less like a strategic move and more like a prolonged shrug. It’s the corporate equivalent of saying, “Oh, you think we’re worried? We’re *definitely* not worried.” The implication, of course, is that Prosser is under consideration, that Apple is weighing the potential consequences of a response. But the phrasing – “has not indicated” – is a masterpiece of obfuscation. It doesn’t deny communication; it simply implies a level of thoughtfulness so profound that it borders on the pathological.

The truth, as anyone who’s followed this story remotely closely knows, is that Prosser has been a force of nature. He’s actively promoting his “Empire” podcast, which is, let’s be honest, entirely built on the back of this lawsuit. To suggest he’s suddenly paralyzed by the prospect of responding is… generous.

The assumption underpinning Apple’s statement, and frankly, the entire situation, is that legal strategy dictates a rigid timetable for responses to allegations. This is a cornerstone of corporate behavior, and a deeply flawed one at that. Legal strategy isn’t about adhering to some imaginary schedule; it’s about managing risk. And Apple’s silence, coupled with this carefully worded statement, suggests they’re prioritizing damage control over aggressively pursuing a resolution.

It’s almost as if Apple realizes the sheer, unadulterated chaos Prosser has unleashed. They’re letting him run wild, seemingly believing that a little bit of public spectacle is preferable to a swift, decisive response that might actually confront the core of the allegations.

The fact that Apple is meticulously crafting its response, agonizing over the timing of a reply to a leak that’s already dominated tech news for weeks, speaks volumes. It’s less about justice, and more about controlling the narrative. And frankly, that’s a far more believable explanation than assuming Prosser has suddenly developed a crippling fear of legal proceedings.

Let’s be honest: the entire thing reeks of a strategic misstep. Apple should have responded with a firm, immediate denial. Instead, they’ve embraced the drama, transforming a potential legal issue into a captivating, if slightly embarrassing, PR spectacle. And their justification for this inaction? “Jon Prosser ‘has not indicated’ when he may respond to lawsuit.” It’s a masterclass in passive-aggressive deflection.

Keywords: Jon Prosser, Apple, Lawsuit, Tech News, PR, Legal Strategy, Leaks, Empire Podcast, Corporate Response