Okay, here’s a blog post responding to that incredibly exciting update.

—

**Apple’s Ghost of Communication: A Response to Jon Prosser’s “Active Communications”**

Let’s be brutally honest: the tech world thrives on drama, and sometimes, that drama comes wrapped in a vague, carefully worded statement from Apple. And today’s update about Jon Prosser – “Apple says Jon Prosser ‘has not indicated’ when he may respond to lawsuit” – is a masterclass in obfuscation. It’s like watching a mime try to explain quantum physics.

The core claim here is that Prosser hasn’t indicated when he might respond to the lawsuit. Let’s unpack *that*. “Has not indicated.” Seriously? That’s the best they’ve got? It’s the tech equivalent of saying, “We’re thinking about it.” It’s a passive-aggressive way of saying, “We’re completely ignoring you, but we’ll throw you a bone of vague denial.”

**The Claim: Prosser Has Been in “Active Communications”**

This is where the game truly begins. Prosser stated he’s been in “active communications with Apple.” Now, let’s be realistic. “Active communications” could mean anything from a polite email exchange to a full-blown, screaming match involving lawyers and a whiteboard covered in diagrams. Apple, predictably, isn’t offering any clarification. Why would they? Providing detail would, you know, actually *reveal* something. They’re masters of strategic ambiguity, and frankly, we’re starting to suspect it’s a deliberate tactic. It’s like a magician constantly refusing to show you how the trick works, just to heighten the sense of wonder (and frustration).

**The Assumption: Apple is Innocent and Unconcerned**

The underlying assumption is that Apple is, of course, blameless in this whole situation. This assumes that they’re somehow above reproach, acting with the utmost transparency and goodwill. Let’s just pause for a moment and consider the track record. Remember the initial leaks regarding the iPhone 12? The alleged internal emails? The persistent rumors about rushed development? It’s a little rich to suddenly portray them as victims of a rogue YouTuber. It’s the tech world’s version of a politician claiming to have “no recollection” of a questionable action.

**The Assumption: Prosser is a Threat**

The whole situation hinges on the idea that Prosser somehow poses a *threat*. And let’s be blunt: he *did* release information about Apple’s plans for a September event, information that Apple clearly didn’t want to become public. However, framing this as a “threat” elevates Prosser to a level of espionage. It’s a convenient way to justify the legal action and solidify the narrative that he’s deliberately trying to disrupt Apple’s operations.

**SEO Keywords:** Jon Prosser, Apple Lawsuit, iPhone Leaks, Tech News, YouTube, September Event, Apple, Legal Action, Tech Drama

**Conclusion:**

Apple’s statement is a masterful display of deflection. It’s a carefully constructed narrative designed to minimize the impact of the lawsuit and maintain control of the narrative. And honestly, at this point, we’re more interested in *how* they’re communicating, rather than *what* they’re saying. It’s a classic case of style over substance, and frankly, we’re starting to suspect it’s a deliberate strategy to keep us all guessing. Let’s be clear: the truth is out there, but Apple’s determined to make it incredibly difficult to find.