Okay, here’s a blog post responding to the provided summary, meeting all your specifications:

—

Let’s be clear: the headline “Apple says Jon Prosser ‘has not indicated’ when he may respond to lawsuit” is the digital equivalent of a toddler throwing a tantrum in a boardroom. It’s a masterclass in deflection, a strategic maneuver designed to obfuscate rather than address. And frankly, it’s incredibly tiresome.

The core claim, as presented – that Apple says Prosser hasn’t indicated when he’ll respond to the lawsuit – is almost entirely devoid of substance. “Has not indicated”? Seriously? That’s the best they’ve got? It’s like saying a hurricane “hasn’t indicated” when it’s about to flatten your coastal town. It’s a carefully worded dodge, designed to suggest that Prosser is simply… unresponsive.

The underlying assumption here is that Prosser *should* be responding, and that his silence constitutes guilt. But let’s dissect this. Prosser, a prominent tech YouTuber with a significant audience, was alleging insider information about upcoming Apple products – specifically, a working iPhone 15 Pro with a titanium design – was leaked to him by Apple employees. This isn’t about simple silence; it’s about a serious accusation of breach of confidentiality, potentially involving trade secrets and significant legal ramifications.

Apple’s response, framed as “has not indicated,” isn’t a denial of wrongdoing; it’s a manipulation tactic. They’re essentially saying, “We haven’t given him a specific timeframe because we’re not admitting anything, and frankly, we’re probably scrambling to gather evidence to disprove his claims.” The fact that they’ve framed it in this way suggests they *know* he has evidence.

Furthermore, the “active communications” Prosser mentioned *before* this statement are crucial. He wasn’t simply ignoring Apple; he was actively engaging with them. To then portray this as mere silence is a significant misrepresentation. It’s almost as if Apple is trying to paint him as a shadowy figure lurking in the dark, rather than a journalist attempting to expose potential wrongdoing.

Let’s be realistic: Apple’s legal team is known for its aggressive approach. They’ll undoubtedly be digging deep, scrutinizing everything Prosser has said and done. But framing the situation this way – emphasizing the lack of a response – is a classic PR move. It’s designed to create the impression of a cornered animal, while simultaneously deflecting responsibility.

The truth is, the lawsuit itself is already a messy situation, fueled by speculation and leaked information. Apple’s response isn’t resolving anything; it’s simply adding another layer of obfuscation to an already complicated story. It’s a brilliant demonstration of how to make a complex situation even more confusing – a skill, frankly, that’s become almost trademarked within the tech industry.

Ultimately, this exchange isn’t about justice or accountability; it’s about Apple managing its brand image during a period of significant product development and speculation. And let’s face it, sometimes, the most compelling narrative isn’t the truth, but the drama.

—

**SEO Keywords:** Jon Prosser, Apple Lawsuit, iPhone 15 Pro, Tech Leaks, Apple PR, Legal Disputes, Tech News