Okay, here’s a blog post responding to that ridiculously brief and frustrating update.

—

## Apple’s Dodging Game: When “Active Communications” Means “We’re Totally Terrified”

Let’s be clear: the headline “Apple says Jon Prosser ‘has not indicated’ when he may respond to lawsuit” is less a statement and more a carefully constructed sandbag. It’s the kind of terse, vaguely threatening language that suggests Apple is desperately trying to avoid actually *answering* any questions about the ongoing lawsuit stemming from Prosser’s leaked Apple event information. And frankly, it’s brilliant – in the most infuriating way possible.

The core claim here is that Prosser hasn’t “indicated when he may respond to lawsuit.” Let’s unpack this. “Active communications with Apple” – according to Prosser himself – followed by this utterly dismissive statement. It’s like a boxer throwing a jab and then just backing away, muttering, “He didn’t really commit to the punch, did he?”

**The Assumption (and it’s a doozy):** Apple seems to be operating under the assumption that simply *having* “active communications” automatically absolves them of any obligation to address the allegations. This is a spectacularly bad assumption, fueled, I suspect, by a deep-seated paranoia. They’ve been burned before, haven’t they? Remember the whole “everything is fine” debacle around the iPhone 6 rumors back in 2013? Let’s not pretend this is a new strategy.

**The Claim:** The statement essentially says, “Prosser hasn’t told us when he’ll respond, so we don’t have to.” This is… remarkably unconvincing. It’s a classic stalling tactic. Legal proceedings hinge on evidence and responses. To simply say someone hasn’t “indicated” is a deliberate obfuscation, designed to buy time and create maximum uncertainty. It’s the legal equivalent of drawing a smiley face on a document and hoping everyone forgets about the glaring discrepancies.

**My Counterpoint (and it’s going to sting):** The fact that Apple hasn’t provided a timeline for Prosser’s response speaks volumes. It’s not about the *timing*; it’s about control. They’re trying to dictate the narrative. The legal system is built on transparency and accountability. Apple’s silence smacks of an attempt to intimidate Prosser and, frankly, discourage any further scrutiny of their practices.

Furthermore, let’s be honest – the “has not indicated” phrasing is just… awkward. It’s the kind of sentence lawyers construct to avoid saying anything concrete. It’s a linguistic shrug, designed to avoid answering the question directly. It’s less a statement of fact and more a legal hedge.

**The Bottom Line:** This update isn’t news; it’s a carefully crafted smokescreen. Apple’s insistence on this vague statement highlights the ongoing tension and the company’s apparent reluctance to engage with the core issues raised by Prosser’s lawsuit. It’s a masterclass in strategic ambiguity, and frankly, a little insulting to anyone actually interested in getting to the truth.

**SEO Keywords:** Jon Prosser, Apple Lawsuit, Leaked Apple Event, Apple Lawsuit Update, Tech News, Apple, Leaks, Legal Disputes.
—