Okay, here’s a blog post responding to the provided summary, aiming for the requested tone and style.

—

Let’s be clear: the tech world is a swamp. And somewhere in that murky water, Apple is apparently trying to quietly drown out a persistent rumor mill. The latest update – “Apple says Jon Prosser ‘has not indicated’ when he may respond to lawsuit” – reads less like a serious legal statement and more like a particularly desperate attempt at damage control.

Let’s dissect this tiny, carefully-worded press release. The core claim is that Jon Prosser, the infamous Apple leaker, hasn’t specified a timeline for his response to the lawsuit. “Has not indicated.” Brilliant. It’s the legal equivalent of saying, “We’re not saying anything, so you can’t accuse us of avoiding the question!” Seriously, Apple lawyers, are you *trying* to make this worse?

**The Argument:** The implication here is that Prosser’s active communication with Apple – which he himself admitted to – somehow necessitates a pre-determined timeline for his response. This suggests that simply talking to the company means you’re automatically obligated to engage in a legal dance, dictated by their schedule. It’s a spectacularly arrogant assumption. It’s as if Apple is saying, “We’re going to schedule *your* response, and if you don’t show up on time, we’ll just… ignore you.”

**The Claim:** Apple is positioning this as evidence that Prosser isn’t cooperating or intends to engage in a formal response. This, of course, feeds directly into the narrative Prosser has been building – a narrative of insider information and a desire to challenge Apple’s claims about the iPhone 12 Pro leaks.

**The Assumption:** The biggest assumption here is that Apple *needs* to be heard from. They’re assuming that Prosser’s continued communication signifies an imminent, forceful response. But let’s be realistic. Apple’s legal team is known for methodical, often glacial, progress. It’s far more likely they’re simply delaying, gathering more evidence, and letting the situation simmer. They’re treating this like a slow-moving, strategically-timed migraine rather than a potentially explosive legal battle.

**My Counterpoint (and a Little Roast):**

Look, Jon Prosser has built his brand on leaks and speculation. He’s a fascinating figure in the tech landscape, bordering on a folk hero for some. But Apple’s response feels less like a strategic legal move and more like an embarrassed shrug. They’re afraid of letting Prosser dictate the terms of the conversation, which is frankly, not surprising. Instead of trying to control the narrative with bureaucratic delay, Apple should simply focus on proving their case.

Furthermore, the fact that Apple is framing this as a *need* for Prosser to respond is almost comical. It’s like a toddler demanding their juice box before they’ll go to bed. It’s entirely self-serving, and frankly, a little pathetic.

**SEO Keywords:** Jon Prosser, Apple Lawsuit, iPhone 12 Pro Leaks, Tech Leaks, Apple, Legal Disputes, Tech News

—

Do you want me to generate a response to a different article summary?