Okay, here’s a blog post responding to that incredibly brief and frankly, baffling, update. Let’s dissect this Apple-Prosser situation with a healthy dose of skepticism and a sprinkle of amusement.

—

**Apple’s Latest Move: Officially Ignoring a Guy Who Might Be About to Explode Their Whole Ecosystem**

Let’s be perfectly clear: the statement from Apple that Jon Prosser “has not indicated” when he might respond to the lawsuit is less a legal strategy and more a desperate shrug. It’s the digital equivalent of saying, “Yeah, he’s threatening to reveal everything. We’re just… not worried.” And frankly, I’m starting to think they *should* be.

The initial news – that Prosser was in “active communications” with Apple – was already a bizarre development. The man who, remember, famously leaked information about the iPhone 12 *before* Apple’s official announcement, was apparently talking to the company about a lawsuit? It reads like a particularly elaborate, and frankly, awkward, game of telephone.

But Apple’s subsequent response – that he hasn’t “indicated” when he’ll respond – is where things get truly fascinating. Let’s unpack this. “Has not indicated” is, of course, legal boilerplate designed to avoid committing to anything. It’s the phrase lawyers use when they don’t actually know what they’re doing. It’s brilliant, really. It expertly avoids acknowledging the elephant in the room: Prosser possesses potentially devastating information about Apple’s plans, including the rumored AR/VR headset and a supposed “Springboard” project, and Apple is essentially telling the world, “We’re playing it cool.”

**The Assumptions Here Are… Well, Let’s Just Say They’re Interesting**

Apple’s assumption here seems to be that Prosser will simply go silent. This is a profoundly optimistic assessment, considering Prosser’s track record. It’s like assuming a bear is afraid of you after you’ve accidentally stumbled into its territory. The assumption that he’s just *going* to stop talking is, at best, naive. It completely ignores the incentive he has to reveal information – and the fact that he has a highly engaged audience eagerly awaiting updates.

Furthermore, Apple’s response subtly implies that Prosser is somehow *asking* for a response. This is a convenient framing, shifting the narrative from Apple potentially being cornered to Prosser being the one pursuing something. It’s a classic tactic: make the other party look like the aggressor.

**Let’s Be Realistic (and Slightly Angry)**

Look, I’m not saying Prosser is a saint. He has a history of leaking information, and that’s problematic. But the fact that Apple is treating this lawsuit with such nonchalance – coupled with this carefully crafted, utterly vague, “he hasn’t indicated” statement – suggests they’re deeply concerned. They’re likely spooked by the potential fallout.

The underlying assumption – that Apple’s secrecy is impenetrable – has been spectacularly shattered. Prosser’s initial statement wasn’t a coincidence; it was a calculated move. And Apple’s reaction is a clear sign that the game has changed.

The post-response silence isn’t a sign of confidence; it’s a sign of panic. And frankly, at this point, we’re all just waiting to see what bombshell Prosser will drop next. Don’t expect Apple to be happy about it.

—

**SEO Notes:**

* **Keywords:** Apple, Jon Prosser, lawsuit, leaks, AR/VR headset, Springboard, iPhone 12
* **Meta Description:** “Follow the latest developments in the Jon Prosser vs. Apple lawsuit. We break down Apple’s response and analyze the potential implications of Prosser’s leaked information.”