Apple says Jon Prosser ‘has not indicated’ when he may respond to lawsuit

Apple’s statement regarding Jon Prosser’s alleged involvement in leaking confidential information about upcoming Apple products is, let’s be honest, a masterclass in carefully worded obfuscation. “Has not indicated when he may respond” – it’s like a legal shrug wrapped in a passive-aggressive disclaimer. Let’s dissect this carefully crafted non-response, because frankly, the entire situation smells like a meticulously staged performance.

The primary argument here, as presented by Apple, isn’t about justice or protecting intellectual property. It’s about control. It’s about demonstrating to the world – and, crucially, to the internet – that Apple is *not* simply going to roll over and let a disgruntled YouTuber (who, let’s be clear, has a documented history of… enthusiastic leaks) dictate the narrative. This isn’t about legal precedent; it’s about Apple establishing its dominance in the information war. They’ve successfully weaponized the phrase “has not indicated” into a potent symbol of their unwavering commitment to maintaining secrecy, regardless of the actual evidence.

The claim, as subtly stated, is that Prosser is actively engaged in communication. “Active communications” – a phrase dripping with an almost unsettling level of specificity. What kind of communications? Are they discussing the merits of the lawsuit? Are they outlining strategies for further leaks? Are they sharing insider details about the upcoming Vision Pro headset? Of course, Apple isn’t saying. It’s a brilliant bit of strategic ambiguity designed to fuel speculation and keep the story alive. It’s like watching a cat play with a laser pointer – endlessly entertaining, but ultimately pointless.

The assumption underpinning this entire response is, predictably, that Prosser *is* communicating. And, based on Prosser’s own statements, there’s a significant chance that’s true. He’s repeatedly asserted he’s been in contact with Apple, demanding a response to the lawsuit. Apple’s reply simply denies that he’s indicated *when* he will respond. This doesn’t negate the fact that he *is* responding. It’s the legal equivalent of saying, “I’m not saying you’re lying, I’m just saying you haven’t said when you’re going to lie.”

The irony, of course, is palpable. Apple, a company renowned for its secrecy and its meticulously curated brand image, is now engaged in a public spectacle of denial. They’re attempting to portray themselves as victims of a rogue YouTuber, when in reality, the entire situation is a consequence of their own willingness to share information with Prosser in the first place. It’s the age-old story of the fox guarding the henhouse, except the henhouse is filled with prototypes and the fox has a remarkably good Instagram account.

Furthermore, let’s address the obvious: this entire situation is an excellent PR opportunity for Prosser. He’s skillfully positioned himself as the aggrieved party, holding a significant amount of leverage over Apple. Apple’s response doesn’t diminish his position; it actually amplifies it. It’s like trying to extinguish a bonfire with a single drop of water.

Ultimately, Apple’s “has not indicated” statement isn’t a strategic triumph. It’s a carefully crafted distraction, a desperate attempt to regain control of a narrative that’s rapidly spiraling out of their hands. And, let’s be honest, it’s just plain annoying. It’s a perfect example of how a company can spend an exorbitant amount of time and resources attempting to avoid saying what they actually mean. It’s the digital equivalent of running around in circles, hoping no one notices.

Keywords: Apple, Jon Prosser, Leaks, Lawsuit, Tech, PR, Vision Pro, iPhone, Apple Lawsuit, Information Warfare, Tech News.