Okay, here’s a blog post responding to the article’s summary – let’s call it a “re-evaluation.”

—

Let’s be honest, the headline reads like a desperate plea from a dying star. “Bored Ape Yacht Club is Making a Comeback.” A comeback? Coming from a project that’s spent the last year or so largely… well, existing in a digital wasteland punctuated by the occasional panicked NFT drop and the lingering aroma of speculative frenzy? It’s like watching a particularly flamboyant peacock try to regain its feathers after a particularly brutal encounter with a lawnmower.

The article’s core claim – that Otherside, the Bored Ape metaverse, has been a “long time coming” – is, frankly, a stunning display of optimism. “Long time coming” suggests a deliberate, carefully-planned evolution. What we’ve actually witnessed is a project perpetually stuck in “beta test – please send help” mode. The delay of the Otherside launch, stretching from 2022 into 2024, is a significant indicator of this. It’s not a testament to a brilliant, meticulously-developed world; it’s a testament to overpromise and a truly remarkable ability to manage expectations… poorly.

The assertion that Otherside is now on the verge of a resurgence completely ignores the incredibly poor user experience. Let’s be clear: the initial launch was a disaster. Reports of server instability, bugs, and a general lack of engaging content were rampant. The “metaverse” felt less like a thriving digital society and more like a glitchy, unfinished demo. To suggest it’s suddenly “coming into its own” after this initial, spectacularly flawed introduction is… well, it’s a bold move.

Furthermore, the argument implicitly assumes that simply *having* a metaverse is enough. The metaverse landscape is currently saturated with projects, each vying for attention and user engagement. Otherside, with its initial problems and a lack of compelling reasons to visit, faces an uphill battle. It’s not enough to just build a digital world; you need to populate it with genuinely interesting experiences, robust tools for creators, and a community that *wants* to be there. The Bored Ape Yacht Club brand has historically been about exclusivity and status, not necessarily about compelling content.

Let’s also address the underlying assumption that Bored Ape holders will magically flock back to Otherside. NFT ownership doesn’t automatically translate into metaverse engagement. People bought Bored Apes for investment, for social status, and for the thrill of being part of a hyped-up community. The promise of a metaverse doesn’t necessarily rekindle that initial passion, especially if the core product is still struggling to function properly.

Finally, the article’s implication—that this is *now* a good time for Otherside—is frankly ludicrous. The broader crypto market is still navigating significant headwinds, and the NFT space is grappling with a serious lack of mainstream adoption. To suggest a renewed interest in Otherside, a project that already failed spectacularly to launch, is a bet on a fundamentally unstable foundation.

It’s a reminder that hype is fleeting, and that a good idea, even one with considerable initial funding, can be utterly derailed by poor execution. Let’s hope the team behind Otherside has learned a valuable lesson: sometimes, the best way to “make a comeback” is to actually *build* a decent product.

—