Apple says Jon Prosser ‘has not indicated’ when he may respond to lawsuit

Okay, let’s dissect this. It’s less a statement and more a carefully crafted shrug. “Apple says Jon Prosser ‘has not indicated’ when he may respond to lawsuit.” Seriously? This reads like a legal team’s attempt to paper over a rapidly sinking ship with a strategically placed doily.

Let’s unpack this masterpiece of passive aggression. The core argument here, hammered home with the subtlety of a sledgehammer, is that Jon Prosser is being…difficult. And, more specifically, that he’s not going to tell them when he’s going to fight back. Which, let’s be honest, is the entire point. It’s not about the lawsuit; it’s about control.

The claim, delivered with that uniquely Apple-esque dryness, is that Prosser’s “active communications with Apple” somehow necessitate a timeline for a response. This assumes that because Prosser is talking to Apple, he’s obligated to provide a schedule for legal strategy. It’s like saying, “Because you’re breathing, you need to tell us when you’re going to exhale.” The logic is, frankly, astonishing.

The underlying assumption is that Prosser is either incompetent or, worse, intentionally stalling. The implication is that his communication with Apple is somehow a nefarious tactic to prolong the legal battle. It completely disregards the fact that Prosser has a right to seek counsel and develop a defense. It’s a classic case of “we don’t like you asking questions, so we’ll pretend you’re not.”

Furthermore, the assertion that Prosser hasn’t indicated when he *might* respond is a brilliant tactic. It avoids directly addressing the fact that he *is* communicating, and it creates a constant state of anxious speculation. “He hasn’t indicated,” implies a complete absence of action, even though Prosser has demonstrably been in dialogue. It’s the legal equivalent of deflecting a direct hit with a strategically placed pillow.

Let’s be clear: Prosser’s communications are *precisely* what Apple fears. They fear information, they fear scrutiny, and they desperately want to control the narrative. This response isn’t about legal strategy; it’s about damage control. It’s a masterclass in obfuscation, and frankly, a little bit sad. It highlights the lengths Apple will go to when faced with a potentially damaging leak, and it underscores the inherent tension between the tech giant and the ever-vigilant independent news sources.

Anyone looking for a lesson in PR, or perhaps a healthy dose of cynicism about Silicon Valley’s approach to accountability, should pay close attention. This isn’t a legal statement; it’s a carefully curated performance, and Apple’s playing for the audience.

#Apple #JonProsser #Lawsuit #TechNews #PR #SiliconValley #Legal #Controversy #Tech