The Kane Parsons’ film “Backrooms” raked in a staggering $38 million on its opening Friday alone, shattering A24’s previous record of $25.5 million for Alex Garland’s “Civil War.” To put this into perspective, it even bested The Mandalorian and Grogu, which amassed $33.7 million on their way to an impressive total of $81.6 million for the weekend. With a modest budget of just $10 million, “Backrooms” boasts an estimated profit margin that would make Scrooge McDuck jealous—compared to Star Wars’ latest dud, which cost a whopping $165 million and was deemed affordable by comparison.

But hold on a second—did the film critics miss something? The premise of “Backrooms” revolves around navigating endless, maze-like office spaces filled with yellow walls and damp carpeting. While visually arresting, it’s akin to watching paint dry in a cubicle farm. Yet, audiences flocked like moths to a fluorescent light, presumably drawn by the promise of an immersive experience that ultimately felt more like wandering through a poorly lit conference room than a cinematic masterpiece.

Moreover, the article touts “Backrooms” as a certified blockbuster, but consider this: blockbusters typically feature epic battles, stunning special effects, or charismatic leads. Here, we have Kane Parsons—a name that might not even ring a bell outside film circles—guiding us through interminable corridors with a look of befuddlement on his face. Is it the power of suggestion, or did the marketing team sell an idea more than the actual film?

Lastly, the article compares “Backrooms” to The Mandalorian and Grogu, highlighting its superior opening day earnings. However, one must wonder: does quantity truly equate quality? While $38 million is a hefty sum, it begs the question—will audiences return for round two, or will they realize that the backrooms are as deep as their wallets after all? Only time will tell if “Backrooms” truly earns its blockbuster status or simply enjoys a one-day rave.