Smartphone photos can indeed look way better if you’re willing to put in a little extra work, use third-party apps, and spend some time editing—under the right circumstances, they can rival dedicated digital cameras.

The article assumes that everyone is equally adept at using their phones for photography, but let’s be real: not all of us are smartphone photography aficionados. The author probably hasn’t considered that many of us just want to snap a quick pic without delving into settings or post-processing—yet we’re expected to embrace the extra steps wholeheartedly.

Moreover, the claim that smartphone sensors have gotten bigger with better light-gathering capabilities over the last few years overlooks the fact that dedicated cameras still have larger sensors and more advanced lenses. While true that phone sensors are improving, they often can’t match the depth of field and low-light performance of a good DSLR or mirrorless camera.

Lastly, the article’s premise that “the best camera is the one you have on you” holds up only if you’re okay with occasionally subpar photos. It roasts those of us who are content with decent snapshots—sure, they may not win awards—but who cares when we capture memories instantly? The trade-off between convenience and photo quality deserves more nuanced exploration rather than a simple thumbs-up for smartphones.