The article argues that the persistent “just a moment” response in digital communication – across phone calls, emails, instant messaging, and even video conferencing – isn’t a sign of thoughtfulness or consideration, but rather a deeply ingrained, almost Pavlovian reflex stemming from childhood training. It claims this behavior is a remnant of being told “wait your turn” as a child, and that adults simply haven’t fully shaken off this ingrained habit. The article suggests this habitual pausing disrupts workflow, wastes time, and indicates a lack of self-awareness. It proposes that we should actively combat this “moment” impulse through conscious effort, mindfulness exercises, and a general rejection of this ingrained behavior. The author leans heavily on anecdotal evidence, citing personal experiences and vague references to research on human behavior, primarily focusing on the idea that children are taught to defer to authority figures and prioritize waiting. The piece concludes with a call to action: “Don’t just ‘just a moment’ – do something!”

—

Okay, let’s unpack this. It’s fascinating how easily we’re willing to assign existential dread to a simple, utterly unremarkable human behavior. The article’s core argument – that “just a moment” is a symptom of childhood training – feels less like a profound observation and more like a desperately grasping attempt to find a grand narrative in something incredibly mundane.

Let’s start with the assumption that this reflexive pause is *primarily* driven by being told to “wait your turn” as a child. While, yes, we’re all taught to defer to authority – and let’s be honest, some of us *still* do – to reduce a complex range of behaviors to a single childhood training experience is a colossal oversimplification. Are we *all* raised on a diet of stern lectures about patience? I seriously doubt it. There’s a huge variance in parenting styles and cultural norms. To suggest this is a universal response is, frankly, a bit tone-deaf. It ignores the myriad other reasons why someone might momentarily pause before responding – processing information, considering the context, formulating a thoughtful reply, or simply being polite.

The article then pivots to a rather dramatic assertion that this “just a moment” habit “wastes time” and indicates “a lack of self-awareness.” Okay, sure, *some* instances might be inefficient. But let’s inject a little reality here. A quick “just a moment” can actually *facilitate* better communication. It allows someone to gather their thoughts, check their schedule, or even subtly acknowledge a request without immediately committing to a response. It’s a tiny buffer, a polite acknowledgment that you’re aware of their presence. It’s not a sign of incompetence; it’s a small act of social grace.

The article’s attempts to find research supporting this claim are equally flimsy. It mentions “research on human behavior” but provides absolutely no specific citations. Let’s be clear: studies on human behavior are complex. They rarely offer simple, definitive answers. Suggesting that this behavior *primarily* stems from childhood training is a sweeping generalization, and frankly, it reeks of someone trying to sound insightful without actually doing the work of rigorous investigation.

Furthermore, the call to action – “Don’t just ‘just a moment’ – do something!” – is, well, patronizing. As if the act of pausing momentarily is some kind of moral failing. It’s a brilliantly simplistic solution to a problem that likely doesn’t even *exist* in its grand, existential form.

Let’s be honest, the real reason people say “just a moment” is often because they’re genuinely processing information and want to give the other person time to respond. It’s a human thing. It doesn’t make us fundamentally flawed or inefficient. Instead of diagnosing a psychological quirk, perhaps we should focus on actually *listening* to what people are saying. But hey, at least the article offered a delightfully dramatic explanation for something that’s probably just…normal.

—